Research standard
Guides should begin with the user's real problem, not a keyword template. The writer should identify likely causes, the safest order of checks, failure points that are easy to confuse, and the moment a technician should take over.
Source hierarchy
We prefer primary or technically authoritative sources where they are available: manufacturer manuals, service documentation, official installation instructions, standards, regulator guidance and reputable technical references.
A guide should not include low-quality references merely to make the source list look longer.
AI-assisted content
AI may assist with outlining, drafting, rewriting, content organization and quality checks. It is not treated as a source. Technical claims must still be grounded in appropriate reference material or review.
Technical review
Where a guide includes repair steps, safety boundaries or technical diagnosis, reviewer information should reflect a real review process. Reviewer names, roles and expertise should not be fabricated.
Corrections and updates
When a technical error is identified, the content should be corrected promptly. Material updates should refresh the visible update date when they meaningfully change the guide.
Advertising and commercial relationships
Advertising placement must not determine the editorial conclusion of a guide. Paid placement, affiliate relationships and sponsored content should be disclosed where applicable.